Quantitative Androgen Deficiency in the Aging Male (qADAM)

10-item symptom survey to facilitate the detection of men at risk for androgen (or testosterone) deficiency.

Audience: PATIENT

Published by EVAL Foundation

Revision 1 · Published February 6, 2026

Citation

<p>The qADAM is a quantitative modification of the original ADAM questionnaire. The original 10 questions are property of Saint Louis University and were developed by John E. Morley, M.B., B.Ch. The quantitative scoring system was validated and published by Mohamed et al. (2010).</p><ul><li><strong>For the Questions (Original ADAM):</strong> Morley, J. E., Charlton, E., Patrick, P., Kaiser, F. E., Cadeau, P., McCready, D., &amp; Perry, H. M., III. (2000). Validation of a screening questionnaire for androgen deficiency in aging males. <i>Metabolism</i>, <i>49</i>(9), 1239–1242.</li><li><strong>For the Scoring System (qADAM):</strong> Mohamed, O., Freundlich, R. E., Dakik, H. K., Grober, E. D., Najari, B., Lipshultz, L. I., &amp; Khera, M. (2010). The quantitative ADAM questionnaire: a new tool in quantifying the severity of hypogonadism. <i>International Journal of Impotence Research</i>, <i>22</i>(1), 20–24.</li></ul>

Summary

Summary&nbsp;The qADAM (quantitative Androgen Deficiency in the Aging Male) questionnaire is an enhanced screening tool for potential low testosterone (hypogonadism) that provides a measure of symptom severity. The qADAM is a quantitative modification of the original ADAM questionnaire. The original 10 questions are property of Saint Louis University and were developed by John E. Morley, M.B., B.Ch. The quantitative scoring system was validated and published by Mohamed et al. (2010).For the Questions (Original ADAM): Morley, J. E., Charlton, E., Patrick, P., Kaiser, F. E., Cadeau, P., McCready, D., &amp; Perry, H. M., III. (2000). Validation of a screening questionnaire for androgen deficiency in aging males. Metabolism, 49(9), 1239–1242.For the Scoring System (qADAM): Mohamed, O., Freundlich, R. E., Dakik, H. K., Grober, E. D., Najari, B., Lipshultz, L. I., &amp; Khera, M. (2010). The quantitative ADAM questionnaire: a new tool in quantifying the severity of hypogonadism. International Journal of Impotence Research, 22(1), 20–24.&nbsp;The most critical difference is the scoring mechanism:FeatureOriginal ADAM QuestionnaireQuantitative ADAM (qADAM)ResponseBinary choice (Yes or No)5-point Likert ScalePurposeSimple screening (is the symptom present?)Screening and quantifying severity (how bad is the symptom?)ScoringYes to Q1 (Sex Drive) or Q7* (Erection), OR Yes to any 3 others = Positive Screen (No numerical score)Total Score from 10 (most symptomatic) to 50 (least symptomatic)UtilityGuides need for a blood testGuides need for a blood test and helps monitor treatment response.*Note: Q6 in the ADAM maps to Q6 in the qADAM&nbsp;Questions&nbsp;The qADAM uses the same 10 symptom questions as the original ADAM, but rephrases them slightly to facilitate a graded response. Each question is scored on a 5-point scale, and the score for each question is added together to get the total.#Symptom AreaStandardized QuestionScore 1 (Most Symptomatic)Score 5 (Least Symptomatic)1LibidoHow would you rate your libido (sex drive)?TerribleExcellent2EnergyHow would you rate your energy level?TerribleExcellent3Strength/EnduranceHow would you rate your strength/endurance?TerribleExcellent4EnjoymentHow would you rate your enjoyment of life?TerribleExcellent5MoodHow would you rate your happiness level?TerribleExcellent6ErectionsHow strong are your erections?Extremely WeakExtremely Strong7Work PerformanceHow would you rate your work performance over the past 4 weeks?TerribleExcellent8SleepHow often do you fall asleep after dinner?Every NightNever9SportsHow would you rate your sports ability over the past 4 weeks?TerribleExcellent10HeightHow much height have you lost?2 inches or moreNone - 0.4 inches&nbsp;Scoring&nbsp;&nbsp;The scoring is consistently set up so that a higher score reflects fewer or less severe symptoms (a better outcome).The standard 5-point Likert scale and corresponding score values are:Self-Rating (Example: Libido, Energy, Strength)Score ValueInterpretation (Symptom Severity)Terrible / Extremely Weak1Maximal SymptomsPoor2Severe SymptomsAverage3Mild/Average SymptomsGood4Minimal SymptomsExcellent / Extremely Strong5No Symptoms&nbsp;Interpretation:&nbsp;Score of 10: Most symptomatic (maximal androgen deficiency suggested).Score of 50: Least symptomatic (hormonal status likely optimal based on symptoms).Clinical Utility: The score's value lies in its correlation with serum testosterone levels (demonstrated in studies) and its ability to measure a clinically meaningful improvement (often defined as an increase of ≥ 5 points) after initiating treatment. The qADAM is a powerful tool because it provides a quantitative metric that can be tracked over time, giving doctors a non-invasive way to monitor a patient's quality of life and response to hormonal therapy.&nbsp;Results include:Total Score ##You may be experiencing androgen deficiency (If score &lt; 47 OR Q1 is NOT Excellent OR Q6 is NOT Extremely Strong)It is unlikely that you are experiencing androgen deficiency (If score &gt; 47)

Tags

Literature

Revisions

Current: Revision 1

About this evaluation