Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT)

A 5-question tool to help identify men who may have a problem with premature ejaculation (PE) during sexual activity.

Audience: PRACTITIONER

Published by SMSNA

Revision 2 · Published July 21, 2025

Citation

<p>© 2005 Cronos Clinical Consulting Services, Inc., an IQVIA Company</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);color:rgb(33,33,33);">Symonds T, Perelman MA, Althof S, Giuliano F, Martin M, May K, Abraham L, Crossland A, Morris M. Development and validation of a premature ejaculation diagnostic tool. Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):565-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.028. Epub 2007 Jan 16. PMID: 17275165.</span></p>

Summary

Purpose and Primary UseThe Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assist clinicians in diagnosing premature ejaculation (PE) in adult males. It consists of five questions that assess key aspects of PE, including ejaculatory control, frequency of premature ejaculation, ejaculation with minimal stimulation, distress, and interpersonal difficulty. This tool provides a quantitative score to help identify patients who may be experiencing PE and to classify the likelihood. It is intended for use during a clinical consultation where PE is suspected or being evaluated.&nbsp;Sources, References, and LiteratureThe PEDT was developed and validated by Symonds, Perelman, Althof, et al., as detailed in their publication: Symonds T, Perelman MA, Althof S, et al. Development and Validation of a Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool. European Urology. 2007;52(2):565-573. The study describes the development process, which included patient interviews and expert clinician input, and the validation process, which compared PEDT scores with clinical diagnoses of PE made by physicians specializing in sexual medicine. The authors established cutoff scores to differentiate between men with and without PE. The PEDT demonstrated good reliability and validity in identifying men with PE according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria and physician diagnosis. The score cutoffs (≤8 for no PE; 9 or 10 for probable PE; ≥11 for PE) were determined based on optimal sensitivity and specificity.&nbsp;Clinical Workflow and ParametersThe PEDT consists of the patient the following five questions, with the patient selecting one response for each:How difficult is it for you to delay ejaculation? (Not difficult at all (0 points), Somewhat difficult (1 point), Moderately difficult (2 points), Very difficult (3 points), Extremely difficult (4 points))Do you ejaculate before you want to? (Never or almost never (0%) (0 points), Less than half the time (25%) (1 point), About half the time (50%) (2 points), Over half the time (75%) (3 points), Always or almost always (100%) (4 points))Do you ejaculate with very little stimulation? (Never or almost never (0%) (0 points), Less than half the time (25%) (1 point), About half the time (50%) (2 points), Over half the time (75%) (3 points), Always or almost always (100%) (4 points))Do you feel frustrated because of ejaculating before you want to? (Not at all (0 points), Slightly (1 point), Moderately (2 points), Very (3 points), Extremely (4 points))How concerned are you that your time to ejaculation leaves your partner unfulfilled? (Not at all (0 points), Slightly (1 point), Moderately (2 points), Very (3 points), Extremely (4 points))&nbsp;The total score is calculated by summing the points from each question. The maximum possible score is 20.Interpretation of Scores:Total Score ≤ 8: PE unlikely. This suggests that the patient's symptoms are not consistent with a diagnosis of premature ejaculation.Total Score 9 or 10: Possible borderline PE. This suggests that the patient may have some symptoms of PE, and further clinical evaluation is warranted to confirm the diagnosis.Total Score ≥ 11: Highly suggestive of PE. This indicates that the patient's symptoms are strongly consistent with a diagnosis of premature ejaculation.&nbsp;LimitationsThe PEDT is a screening and diagnostic aid, not a definitive diagnostic instrument on its own. It should be used as part of a comprehensive clinical evaluation that includes a detailed sexual, medical, and psychological history. The tool relies on patient self-report, which can be subject to recall bias or social desirability bias. It is validated for adult men and may not be applicable to all populations or contexts. The tool primarily assesses acquired and lifelong PE; other forms or causes of ejaculatory dysfunction may require different assessment methods.

Tags

Literature

Revisions

Current: Revision 2

About this evaluation