Assess functional limitations of those with a variety of foot and ankle conditions
Audience: PATIENT
Published by EVAL Foundation
Revision 1 · Published July 8, 2026
Martin, R. L., R. G. Burdett, and J. J. Irrgang. “Development of the foot and ankle disability index (FADI).” J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29.1 (1999): A32-A33.
What It Is
The FADI is a region-specific, self-reported outcome measure developed by Martin, Burdett, and Irrgang (1999) to assess functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle conditions, most commonly used in chronic ankle instability research.
Structure & Setup
The FADI has two components:
1. FADI Activities Subscale (26 items)
Assesses activities of daily living (ADL). Items cover tasks like:
Standing, walking on even/uneven ground
Going up and down stairs
Walking on hills, curbs
Squatting, coming up on toes
Walking initially, for 5 and 10 minutes
2. FADI Sport Subscale (8 items)
Assesses higher-level sport and activity demands:
Running, jumping, landing
Starting and stopping quickly
Cutting/lateral movements
Low-impact activities
Scoring
Questions 1-22 of the Activity Subscale and questions 1-8 of the Sports Subscale are rated on the following 5-point Likert scale:
4 = None at all
3 = Slight
2 = Moderate
1 = Extreme
0 = Unable to do
Questions 23-26 of the Activities Subscale are rated on the following 5-point Likert scale:
4 = No pain
3 = Mild
2 = Moderate
1 = Severe
0 = Unbearable
A "Not Applicable" option is also available and those items are excluded from scoring.
Final score is calculated as:
(Total points earned ÷ Total possible points) × 100
Resulting in a percentage score from 0–100, where 100% = no disability.
Reliability & Sensitivity
Hale & Hertel (2005) examined the FADI in subjects with chronic ankle instability and found it to be a reliable and sensitive tool for detecting functional deficits in this population — supporting its use as both a diagnostic and outcomes tracking instrument.
Use in Research
The Dekker et al. (2017) study applied the FADI alongside other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in total ankle replacement patients, correlating scores with range of motion — suggesting the FADI captures functional change meaningful enough to correlate with objective physical measurements.
Key Strengths
Region-specific (more sensitive than general functional scales)
Separates daily living from sport demands
Simple percentage scoring is easy to interpret and track over time
Well-validated in chronic ankle instability populations
Original Literature:
Martin, R. L., R. G. Burdett, and J. J. Irrgang. “Development of the foot and ankle disability index (FADI).” J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29.1 (1999): A32-A33.
Additional Literature:
Hale, Sheri A., and Jay Hertel. “Reliability and sensitivity of the Foot and Ankle Disability Index in subjects with chronic ankle instability.” Journal of Athletic training 40.1 (2005): 35.
Dekker, Travis J., et al. “The Value of Motion: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Are Correlated With Range of Motion in Total Ankle Replacement.” Foot & ankle specialist (2017): 1938640017750258.
Select a response that most clodely describes your condition in the last week.
If the activity in question is limited by something other than your foot or ankle, mark not applicable (N/A).
Current: Revision 1
About this evaluation