Summary
Originally published in 2005 in Foot and Ankle International, the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) was developed to assess the physical function of individuals with musculoskeletal disorders of the leg, foot, and ankle. The FAAM is a 29-item self-report instrument that evaluates functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle pathology.Scoring ComponentsThe FAAM comprises two subscales:Activities of Daily Living (21 items): points awarded based on choices. Selecting a choice of n/a excludes question from calculation. Result includes total points and a 0-100% ratingSports (7 items): Selecting a choice of n/a excludes question from calculation. Results include total points and a 0-100% ratingNote: Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), with higher scores indicating better function. The FAAM ADL and Sports subscale scores are calculated as percentages, with 100% representing no functional limitation and 0% representing complete inability.The instrument also includes global function ratings for each domain.ADL Global Function Rating: 0-100%Sports Global Function Rating: 0-100%The instrument also includes a rating of current level of function.Rate of current level of function: Normal, Nearly Normal, Abnormal, Severely abnormalCalculationsA) Activities of Daily Living ScaleNumber of Completed Responses (‘n’); (max = 21)Activities of Daily Living Score = (sum of n responses/ n x 4) ×100B) Sports ScaleNumber of Completed Responses (‘n’); (max = 7)Sports Score = (sum of n responses/ n x 4) x 100The FAAM has strong psychometric properties, including reliability and validity, and is widely used in clinical practice and research to monitor patient progress, establish baselines, and assess treatment outcomes in foot and ankle rehabilitation.Score Developer: Dr. Jesse Van Swearingen is an associate professor in the Department of Physical Therapy at the University of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences and chairs the research committee for the American Physical Therapy Association Academy of Geriatrics.Original Literature:Martin, RobRoy L., et al. “Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).” Foot & Ankle International 26.11 (2005): 968-983.Additional Literature:Martin, Robroy L., and James J. Irrgang. “A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle.” Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 37.2 (2007): 72-84.Cosby, Nicole L., and Jay Hertel. “Clinical assessment of ankle injury outcomes: case scenario using the foot and ankle ability measure.” Journal of sport rehabilitation 20.1 (2011): 89-99.