Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6)
6-item measure of non-specific psychological distress over the past 4 weeks.
CreatorInstructions
The Kessler-6 scale is one of many tools used to screen for psychological distress, such as anxiety or depression.
This is not intended to provide a diagnosis – see a trained health professionals for guidance.
The following ten questions ask about how you have been feeling in the past 4 weeks.
Introduction
The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) is a six-question survey that screens for serious psychological distress over the past four weeks. Ronald C. Kessler, PhD, of Harvard Medical School, and colleagues developed it alongside the longer K10. The K6 is merely a truncated form of the K10 in which four questions are deleted. Its purpose is to quickly identify people likely to have a serious mental illness. In testing, the six-question scale was found to be at least as sensitive as the ten-question scale for discriminating between cases and non-cases of serious mental illness. It’s widely used in national health monitoring: the K6 is now included in the core of the U.S. National Health Interview Survey as well as in the annual National Household Survey on Drug Abuse.
The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) is a 10-question survey that measures general psychological distress, such as anxiety and depressive symptoms, over the past four weeks. Ronald C. Kessler, PhD, a professor at Harvard Medical School, and colleagues developed it in the early 2000s. It was developed with support from the U.S. government’s National Center for Health Statistics for use in the redesigned U.S. National Health Interview Survey. The scale was designed to be sensitive around the threshold for the clinically significant range of distress, to help distinguish cases of serious mental illness from non-cases. It’s widely used in primary care, mental health services, and population surveys. It’s included in the Australian and Canadian equivalents of the U.S. national health survey, and in all the national surveys of the World Mental Health Initiative. Both the K6 and K10 measures overall distress. It doesn’t diagnose a specific disorder.
What it asks
Patients rate how often in the past four weeks they felt: nervous; hopeless; restless or fidgety; so depressed that nothing could cheer them up; that everything was an effort; and worthless. Each item uses the same five answers, from “none of the time” to “all of the time.”
How it’s scored
This tool uses Australian scoring. Each answer is scored from 1 (“none of the time”) to 5 (“all of the time”), and the six scores are added for a total from 6 to 30. Higher scores mean more distress. In the US, the same answers are scored 0 to 4, for a total from 0 to 24. The Australian system results in a score range of 6-30 for the K6, compared with 0–24 in the US system. The Australian total is always exactly 6 points higher than the US total for the same answers.
Higher scores mean higher levels of distress.
How results are interpreted
The K6 uses a single cutoff:
Score (Australian, 6–30) | Result |
|---|---|
6–18 | No probable serious mental illness |
19–30 | Probable serious mental illness |
On Australian scoring, the optimal cut point on the K6 is 6-18 versus 19+. That corresponds to the widely cited US cutoff of 13 or more on the 0–24 scale. A score of 19 or more suggests further clinical assessment is warranted, but it isn’t a diagnosis. Unlike the K10, the K6 has no official mild, moderate, or severe bands.
This is a screening instrument and practitioners should make a clinical judgement as to whether a person needs further assessment and treatment.
Limitations
The cutoff was designed for general population screening. Kessler notes that this cut point is optimal only in a population that has the same prevalence as the total US population, so it may perform differently in clinics where mental illness is more or less common. Like the K10, the K6 measures overall distress rather than a specific condition, and it has no question about suicidal thoughts, so it can’t be used to assess safety. A score below the cutoff doesn’t rule out distress or a mental health condition.
All questions & possible results
K10 ItemsTitle not visible
The following ten questions ask about how you have been feeling in the past 4 weeks.
1. About how often did you feel nervous?
Select one option:
- None of the time
- A little of the time
- Some of the time
- Most of the time
- All of the time
2. About how often did you feel hopeless?
Select one option:
- None of the time
- A little of the time
- Some of the time
- Most of the time
- All of the time
3. About how often did you feel restless or fidgety?
Select one option:
- None of the time
- A little of the time
- Some of the time
- Most of the time
- All of the time
4. About how often did you feel so depressed that nothing could cheer you up?
Select one option:
- None of the time
- A little of the time
- Some of the time
- Most of the time
- All of the time
5. About how often did you feel that everything was an effort?
Select one option:
- None of the time
- A little of the time
- Some of the time
- Most of the time
- All of the time
6. About how often did you feel worthless?
Select one option:
- None of the time
- A little of the time
- Some of the time
- Most of the time
- All of the time
Possible results
K6 Score (<19 pts): Likely to be well
Score of <19 pts suggests no probable seroius mental distress.
Score range is 6-30 pts
Low scores indicate low levels of psychological distress and high scores indicate high levels of psychological distress.
This is a screening instrument and practitioners should make a clinical judgement as to whether a person needs further assessment and treatment.
K6 Score (>18 pts): Likely to have significant or serious mental distress
Score >19 pts suggests probable serious mental distress.
Score range is 6-30 pts
Low scores indicate low levels of psychological distress and high scores indicate high levels of psychological distress.
This is a screening instrument and practitioners should make a clinical judgement as to whether a person needs further assessment and treatment.
Citation
Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S.-L. T., Walters, E. E., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–976.
Literature
Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S.-L. T., Walters, E. E., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–976.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/abs/short-screening-scales-to-monitor-population-prevalences-and-trends-in-nonspecific-psychological-distress/F141675CCD0E08C0FB98E01C006B4E0DAndrews, G., & Slade, T. (2001). Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(6), 494–497.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023036105?via%3DihubAtkins, J., Naismith, S. L., Luscombe, G. M., & Hickie, I. B. (2013). Psychological distress and quality of life in older persons: relative contributions of fixed and modifiable risk factors. BMC Psychiatry, 13(1), 249–249.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-244X-13-249Brooks, R. T., Beard, J., & Steel, Z. (2006). Factor Structure and Interpretation of the K10. Psychological Assessment, 18(1), 62–70.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F1040-3590.18.1.62Donker, T., Comijs, H., Cuijpers, P., Terluin, B., Nolen, W., Zitman, F., & Penninx, B. (2010). The validity of the Dutch K10 and extended K10 screening scales for depressive and anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Research, 176(1), 45–50.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165178109000201?via%3DihubGonda, T., Deane, F. P., & Murugesan, G. (2012). Predicting clinically significant change in an inpatient program for people with severe mental illness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 46(7), 651–658.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0004867412445527Lace, J. W., Greif, T. R., McGrath, A., Grant, A. F., Merz, Z. C., Teague, C. L., & Handal, P. J. (2019). Investigating the factor structure of the K10 and identifying cutoff scores denoting nonspecific psychological distress and need for treatment. Mental Health & Prevention, 13, 100–106.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212657018300825?via%3DihubMerson, F., Newby, J., Shires, A., Millard, M., & Mahoney, A. (2021). The temporal stability of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Australian Psychologist, 56(1), 38–45.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00050067.2021.1893603Rickwood, D., McEachran, J., Saw, A., Telford, N., Trethowan, J., & McGorry, P. (2023). Sixteen years of innovation in youth mental healthcare: Outcomes for young people attending Australia’s headspace centre services. PloS One, 18(6), e0282040–e0282040.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282040Slade, T., Grove, R., & Burgess, P. (2011). Kessler Psychological Distress Scale: Normative Data from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 45(4), 308–316.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3109/00048674.2010.543653Kessler RC, Green JG, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Bromet E, Cuitan M, Furukawa TA, Gureje O, Hinkov H, Hu CY, Lara C, Lee S, Mneimneh Z, Myer L, Oakley-Browne M, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Viana MC, Zaslavsky AM. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010 Jun;19 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4-22. doi: 10.1002/mpr.310. Erratum in: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Mar;20(1):62.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3659799/Puac-Polanco, V., Ziobrowski, H.N., Zainal, N.H., Sampson, N.A., Kessler, R.C. (2025). K10 and K6 Scales. In: Krägeloh, C.U., Alyami, M., Medvedev, O.N. (Eds.) International Handbook of Behavioral Health Assessment (pp. 1-30). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Cham.
https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-030-89738-3_49-2Furukawa, T.A., Kessler, R.C., Slade, T., Andrews, G. (2003). The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being Psychological Medicine. 33:357-362.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12622315/Kessler, R.C., Barker, P.R., Colpe, L.J., Epstein, J.F., Gfroerer, J.C., Hiripi, E., Howes, M.J, Normand, S-L.T., Manderscheid, R.W., Walters, E.E., Zaslavsky, A.M. (2003). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population Archives of General Psychiatry. 60(2), 184-189
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12578436/Green, J.G., Gruber, M.J., Sampson, N.A., Zaslavsky, A.M., Kessler, R.C. (2010). Improving the K6 short scale to predict serious emotional disturbance in adolescents in the USA. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 19(S1), 23-35.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20527003/