Ottawa Ankle Rules
Rules out clinically significant foot and ankle fractures to reduce x-ray imaging
作成者説明
Indication: Patients ≥ 2 years with ankle or midfoot pain or tenderness in the setting of trauma
Precautions: Use clinical judgment if examination may be compromised for any of the following circumstances:
Intoxication
Distracting painful injuries
Gross swelling which prevents palpation of tenderness
Diminished sensation in legs
Uncooperative patient
Anatomy
Introduction
The Ottawa Ankle Rule aids in the judicious use of radiography in acute and midfoot injuries. Indicated in patients ≥ 2 years with ankle or midfoot pain or tenderness in the setting of trauma but ought to use caution in ages < 18 years. Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rule may reduce unnecessary radiographs and radiation exposure while improving patient flow. Additionally, patients without criteria for imaging are unlikely to have a clinically significant fracture.
Using the Ottawa Ankle Rule can reduce the number of unnecessary radiographs, limit radiation exposure, and improve patient flow.
Considerations
Ottawa Rules are good at ruling out fracture (high sensitivity) but poor for ruling in fractures (many false positives).
High Sensitivity (90-100%) for ruling out clinically significant ankle and midfoot fractures (fracture/avulsion > 3 mm)
Lower Specificity (41% for ankle & 79% for Foot) for ruling in facture, and not intended for specific diagnosis.
Palpate the entire distal 6 cm of the fibula and tibia.
Weight bearing counts even if the patient limps.
Precautions: Use clinical judgment if examination may be compromised for any of the following circumstances:
Intoxication
Distracting painful injuries
Gross swelling which prevents palpation of tenderness
Diminished sensation in legs
Uncooperative patient
Rules
An ankle x-ray series is only required if there is pain in the malleolar zone AND any of these findings:
Bone tenderness at the posterior edge or tip of lateral malleolus, OR
Bone tenderness at the posterior edge or tip of medial malleolus, OR
Inability to bear weight both immediately after injury AND in ED.
A foot x-ray series is only required if there is pain in the midfoot zone AND any of these findings:
Bone tenderness at the base of 5th metatarsal, OR
Bone tenderness at the navicular, OR
Inability to bear weight both immediately after injury AND in ED.
すべての質問と考えられる結果
Anatomy
Location of pain
Select all that apply:
- Malleolar
- Midfoot
Malleolar bone tenderness at the posterior edge of the distal 6 cm or the tip of lateral malleolus
Select one option:
- No
- Yes
Malleolar bone tenderness at the posterior edge of the distal 6 cm or the top of medial malleolus
Select one option:
- No
- Yes
In the presence of malleolar bone tenderness, there is an inability to bear weight (unable to take 4 steps) both immediately after injury AND in ED
Limping counts as weight bearing.
Select one option:
- No
- Yes
Midfoot bone tenderness at the base of the 5th metatarsal
Select one option:
- No
- Yes
Midfoot bone tenderness at the navicular
Select one option:
- No
- Yes
In the presence of midfoot tenderness, there is an inability to bear weight (unable to take 4 steps) both immediately after injury AND in ED
Limping counts as weight bearing.
Select one option:
- No
- Yes
考えられる結果
Ruled out: Ankle x-ray series not indicated.
Sensitivity & Specificity
Ottawa Rules are good at ruling out fracture (high sensitivity) but poor for ruling in fractures (many false positives).
- High Sensitivity (90-100%) for ruling out clinically significant ankle and midfoot fractures (fracture/avulsion > 3 mm)
- Lower Specificity (41% for ankle & 79% for Foot) for ruling in facture, and not intended for specific diagnosis.
Management
- X-ray
- RICE plan (Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation)
- Consider splinting/crutches, pain medication or specialty referral as indicated
- Follow-up in 5-7 days if pain and ability to walk are not improved.
Ruled out: Foot x-ray series not indicated.
Sensitivity & Specificity
Ottawa Rules are good at ruling out fracture (high sensitivity) but poor for ruling in fractures (many false positives).
- High Sensitivity (90-100%) for ruling out clinically significant ankle and midfoot fractures (fracture/avulsion > 3 mm)
- Lower Specificity (41% for ankle & 79% for Foot) for ruling in facture, and not intended for specific diagnosis.
Management
- X-ray
- RICE plan (Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation)
- Consider splinting/crutches, pain medication or specialty referral as indicated
- Follow-up in 5-7 days if pain and ability to walk are not improved.
Cannot rule out: Foot x-ray series indicated.
Sensitivity & Specificity
Ottawa Rules are good at ruling out fracture (high sensitivity) but poor for ruling in fractures (many false positives).
- High Sensitivity (90-100%) for ruling out clinically significant ankle and midfoot fractures (fracture/avulsion > 3 mm)
- Lower Specificity (41% for ankle & 79% for Foot) for ruling in facture, and not intended for specific diagnosis.
Management
- X-ray
- RICE plan (Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation)
- Consider splinting/crutches, pain medication or specialty referral as indicated
- Follow-up in 5-7 days if pain and ability to walk are not improved.
Cannot rule out: Ankle x-ray series indicated.
Sensitivity & Specificity
Ottawa Rules are good at ruling out fracture (high sensitivity) but poor for ruling in fractures (many false positives).
- High Sensitivity (90-100%) for ruling out clinically significant ankle and midfoot fractures (fracture/avulsion > 3 mm)
- Lower Specificity (41% for ankle & 79% for Foot) for ruling in facture, and not intended for specific diagnosis.
Management
- X-ray
- RICE plan (Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation)
- Consider splinting/crutches, pain medication or specialty referral as indicated
- Follow-up in 5-7 days if pain and ability to walk are not improved.
引用
Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Worthington JR. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Apr;21(4):384-90. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82656-3. PMID: 1554175.
文献
A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1554175/Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8433468/Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8114236/
- 作成者
Dr. Ian Stiell, MD, MSc, FRCPCProfessor and Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa; Distinguished Professor and University Health Research Chair, University of Ottawa; Senior Scientist, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; and Emergency Physician, The Ottawa Hospital.
- 提供元
EVAL Foundation
- 寄稿者 · 査読者
Jennifer Glen, DNP, FNP-BCEVAL Health, Chief Medical Officer EVAL Foundation