IMPROVE Bleeding Risk Score

Evaluates bleeding risk at hospital admission.

CreatorDr. Hervé Décousus, MD
Play
Favorites
Instructions
  • Utilize upon admission to 14 days after admission or when initiating anticoagulation therapy, primarily for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, in hospitalized patients.

Risk factors at admission

IMPROVE Bleeding Risk Score

The IMPROVE Bleeding Risk Score estimates the risk of in-hospital bleeding in acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients. Utilize upon admission to 14 days after admission or when initiating anticoagulation therapy, primarily for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, in hospitalized patients.

Development

The score was derived by Decousus, Tapson, and the IMPROVE Investigators (Chest, 2011) using data from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE), a multinational observational study that enrolled 15,156 acutely ill medical patients across 12 countries. The strongest independent predictors of in-hospital bleeding identified were active gastroduodenal ulcer (OR 4.15), prior bleeding (OR 3.64), and low platelet count (OR 3.37), with additional contributions from age, hepatic or renal failure, ICU/CCU stay, central venous catheter, rheumatic disease, cancer, and male sex.

The 11 Components

The IMPROVE Bleeding Risk Score is calculated by the addition of the selected points:

Variable

Points

Age, years

<40

0

40-84

1.5

≥85

3.5

Gender

Female

0

Male

1

Renal function (GFR), mL/min/m2

≥60

0

30-59

1

<30

2.5

Current cancer (evidence of active malignancy within the last 6 months)

No

0

Yes

2

Rheumatic disease

No

0

Yes

2

Central venous catheter

No

0

Yes

2

ICU/CCU

No

0

Yes

2.5

Evidence of hepatic failure (INR >1.5)

No

0

Yes

2.5

Platelet count, cells/L

≥50 x 109

0

<50 x 109

4

Bleeding in 3 months before admission

No

0

Yes

4

Active gastroduodenal ulcer

No

0

Yes

4.5

Facts & Figures

IMPROVE Score

Risk of Bleeding

<7

No increased risk of bleeding

  • A score <7 points identifies patients at low risk of in-hospital major or clinically important bleeding.* Anticoagulation prophylaxis may be considered according to the patient's thrombotic risk and local protocol.

≥7

Increased risk of bleeding

  • A score of ≥7 identifies patients at increased risk of in-hospital major or clinically important bleeding.* Avoid anticoagulants where possible and consider non-pharmacologic interventions.

*Major bleeding: A bleeding event contributing to death, bleeding associated with a ≥2 g/dL fall in Hg, or leading to transfusion of ≥2 units of packed red blood cells, or within a critical organ (including intracranial, retroperitoneal, intraocular, adrenal gland, spinal, or pericardial bleeding).

*Non-major but clinically relevant bleeding: Overt gastrointestinal bleeding (except for insignificant hemorrhoidal bleeding), gross hematuria (macroscopic and lasting longer than 24 hours), substantial epistaxis that requires intervention and is recurrent and/or lasts ≥5 minutes, extensive hematoma or bruising (>5 cm in diameter), intra-articular bleeding (documented by aspiration), menorrhagia or metrorrhagia (increased quantity or duration), other bleeding important enough to be recorded on the hospital chart.

Management Considerations

  • Consider using results in tandem with the IMPROVE or IMPROVEDD Risk Score for VTE when assessing the use of thromboprophylaxis during hospitalization.

  • Consider addressing modifiable risk factors for bleeding.

  • Risk and benefits of anti-coagulation should be considered in patients, to include shared decsion-making and informed consent, prior to initiating therapy.

  • Clinical judgement and best practice guidelines supersedes adjunct standalone decision tools.

Important Limitations

  • Developed specifically for acutely ill medical inpatients, not surgical patients — applying it outside that population (as some validation studies have tested) is an extrapolation beyond its original design

  • Not all 11 risk factors have been independently re-validated in every subsequent study — the score functions better as a structured framework for decision-making than as a precise individual probability estimate

  • Bleeding risk should be reassessed throughout the hospital stay rather than treated as fixed at admission — a patient who was high-risk at admission (e.g., recovering from a recent GI bleed) may become low-risk after a period of clinical stability, at which point pharmacologic prophylaxis can be reconsidered

All questions & possible results

Risk factors at admission
Age

Select one option:

  • <40 years
  • 40-84 years
  • ≥85 years
Gender

Select one option:

  • Female
  • Male
Renal function (GFR, mL/min/m²)

Select one option:

  • ≥60
  • 30-59
  • <30
Current cancer
  • Evidence of active malignancy within the last 6 months

Select one option:

  • No
  • Yes
Rheumatic disease

Select one option:

  • No
  • Yes
Central venous catheter

Select one option:

  • No
  • Yes
ICU or CCU

Select one option:

  • No
  • Yes
Evidence of hepatic failure (INR >1.5)

Select one option:

  • No
  • Yes
Platelet count (cells/L)

Select one option:

  • ≥50x10⁹
  • 50x10⁹
Bleeding in 3 months before admission
  • Major bleeding: A bleeding event contributing to death, bleeding associated with a ≥2 g/dL fall in Hg, or leading to transfusion of ≥2 units of packed red blood cells, or within a critical organ (including intracranial, retroperitoneal, intraocular, adrenal gland, spinal, or pericardial bleeding).

  • Non-major but clinically relevant bleeding: Overt gastrointestinal bleeding (except for insignificant hemorrhoidal bleeding), gross hematuria (macroscopic and lasting longer than 24 hours), substantial epistaxis that requires intervention and is recurrent and/or lasts ≥5 minutes, extensive hematoma or bruising (>5 cm in diameter), intra-articular bleeding (documented by aspiration), menorrhagia or metrorrhagia (increased quantity or duration), other bleeding important enough to be recorded on the hospital chart.

Select one option:

  • No
  • Yes
Active gastroduodenal ulcer

Select one option:

  • No
  • Yes
Possible results
IMPROVE Bleeding Risk Score: No increased risk of bleeding (<7pts)
  • A score <7 points identifies patients at low risk of in-hospital major or clinically important bleeding.* Anticoagulation prophylaxis may be considered according to the patient's thrombotic risk and local protocol.

  • Consider using results in tandem with the IMPROVE or IMPROVEDD Risk Score for VTE when assessing the use of thromboprophylaxis during hospitalization.

  • Consider addressing modifiable risk factors for bleeding.

  • Risk and benefits of anti-coagulation should be considered in patients, to include shared decsion-making and informed consent, prior to initiating therapy.

  • Clinical judgement and best practice guidelines supersedes adjunct standalone decision tools.

*Major bleeding: A bleeding event contributing to death, bleeding associated with a ≥2 g/dL fall in Hg, or leading to transfusion of ≥2 units of packed red blood cells, or within a critical organ (including intracranial, retroperitoneal, intraocular, adrenal gland, spinal, or pericardial bleeding).

*Non-major but clinically relevant bleeding: Overt gastrointestinal bleeding (except for insignificant hemorrhoidal bleeding), gross hematuria (macroscopic and lasting longer than 24 hours), substantial epistaxis that requires intervention and is recurrent and/or lasts ≥5 minutes, extensive hematoma or bruising (>5 cm in diameter), intra-articular bleeding (documented by aspiration), menorrhagia or metrorrhagia (increased quantity or duration), other bleeding important enough to be recorded on the hospital chart.

IMPROVE Bleeding Risk Score: Increased risk of bleeding (≥7pts)
  • A score of ≥7 identifies patients at increased risk of in-hospital major or clinically important bleeding.* Avoid anticoagulants where possible and consider non-pharmacologic interventions. Weigh bleeding risk against thrombotic risk before anticoagulation.

  • Consider using results in tandem with the IMPROVE or IMPROVEDD Risk Score for VTE when assessing the use of thromboprophylaxis during hospitalization.

  • Consider addressing modifiable risk factors for bleeding.

  • Risk and benefits of anti-coagulation should be considered in patients, to include shared decsion-making and informed consent, prior to initiating therapy.

  • Clinical judgement and best practice guidelines supersedes adjunct standalone decision tools.

*Major bleeding: A bleeding event contributing to death, bleeding associated with a ≥2 g/dL fall in Hg, or leading to transfusion of ≥2 units of packed red blood cells, or within a critical organ (including intracranial, retroperitoneal, intraocular, adrenal gland, spinal, or pericardial bleeding).

*Non-major but clinically relevant bleeding: Overt gastrointestinal bleeding (except for insignificant hemorrhoidal bleeding), gross hematuria (macroscopic and lasting longer than 24 hours), substantial epistaxis that requires intervention and is recurrent and/or lasts ≥5 minutes, extensive hematoma or bruising (>5 cm in diameter), intra-articular bleeding (documented by aspiration), menorrhagia or metrorrhagia (increased quantity or duration), other bleeding important enough to be recorded on the hospital chart.

Citation

Decousus H, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF, Chong BH, Froehlich JB, Kakkar AK, Merli GJ, Monreal M, Nakamura M, Pavanello R, Pini M, Piovella F, Spencer FA, Spyropoulos AC, Turpie AG, Zotz RB, Fitzgerald G, Anderson FA; IMPROVE Investigators. Factors at admission associated with bleeding risk in medical patients: findings from the IMPROVE investigators. Chest. 2011 Jan;139(1):69-79.

Literature

  • Decousus H, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF, Chong BH, Froehlich JB, Kakkar AK, Merli GJ, Monreal M, Nakamura M, Pavanello R, Pini M, Piovella F, Spencer FA, Spyropoulos AC, Turpie AG, Zotz RB, Fitzgerald G, Anderson FA; IMPROVE Investigators. Factors at admission associated with bleeding risk in medical patients: findings from the IMPROVE investigators. Chest. 2011 Jan;139(1):69-79.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20453069/
  • Rosenberg DJ, Press A, Fishbein J, Lesser M, McCullagh L, McGinn T, Spyropoulos AC. External validation of the IMPROVE Bleeding Risk Assessment Model in medical patients. Thromb Haemost. 2016 Aug 30;116(3):530-6.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27307054/
  • Hostler DC, Marx ES, Moores LK, Petteys SK, Hostler JM, Mitchell JD, Holley PR, Collen JF, Foster BE, Holley AB. Validation of the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism Bleeding Risk Score. Chest. 2016 Feb;149(2):372-9.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26867833/